This Collaborative’s mission is to provide resources for companies that want to learn more about multi-material flexible packaging recovery and define key actions can be taken to improve the end-of-life options of multi-material flexible packaging.
SPC team lead:
Tristanne Davis, Senior Manager
Ashley Leidolf, Dow Chemical
Sridevi Narayan-Sarathy, PepsiCo
Are you a current SPC member who wants to join the Collaborative? Email email@example.com
Not an SPC member yet? Become a member by applying today.
Flexible plastic packaging continues to grow as a material of demand. Between 2010 and 2014 global demand for flexible packaging grew 56 percent. In the U.S., flexible packaging is the fastest growing and second largest segment within the packaging industry.
While we refer to flexible packaging as whole, the types of resins, polymers and formats used to create flexible packaging varies widely. This complexity, created by using one or more types of polymers to create flexible packaging, challenges the efficient collection, separation, recycling and resale of this material. While new innovations and systems have been created to address single polymer materials, limited options for the end-of-life management of multi-materials flexible film packaging continues to challenge these types of packages.
Mono- vs Multi-Material Flexible Packaging
Mono-material flexible packaging uses one polymer only — most often polyethylene. Commonly found in plastic bags, produce bags and self-sealed food storage bags, these can currently be collected and recycled through the U.S. at store-drop-off center, or in limited municipal curbside collection programs.
Multi-material flexible packaging is composed of two or more materials joined together with adhesive or wax. By layering different materials together manufacturers can create a package with unique barrier and mechanical properties. Additionally, multi-material films are typically thinner and lighter than single (mono) material equivalents. This helps reduce demand for resources required to produce and transport packaging–including reduced greenhouse gases. Because of these advantages, in addition to cost savings, when compared to rigid plastics multi-material flexible packaging, specifically food pouches, is anticipated to be one of the fastest growing packaging formats over the next few years. However, their nature as lightweight and multi-material structures is exactly what complicates their ability for recovery, and in particular, their suitability for mechanical recycling.
Current compositions of multi-material flexible packaging vary from three layers up to nine. Because there is no standard composition, and different resins are utilized across the various layers, there is no existing program anywhere across the globe to provide for the public recovery of these materials. With an estimated 40 billion packages produced from multi-material films annually in the U.S., finding solutions to collect, sort and recover these materials is becoming of increasing interest to packaging and waste communities, as well as, consumers across the globe.
By collecting and highlighting global efforts to advance recovery options for multi-material flexible packaging, it is our aim to advance the collective understanding, and shared best practices, towards the goal of creating a sustainable solution for the management of multi-material flexible packaging at their end of life.
Mapping Challenges for Multi-Material Recycling Across the Recovery System
- No standard design
- Risk of food contamination makes retail ready collection less likely
- Consumers not aware of what can be put in Store Drop-off bin
- Too many different designs makes it impossible to identify resin composition
- Material ends up with paper because of its two dimensional format and light weight
- Many films are contaminated by food and drink
- Multiple designs on market makes it difficult to identify at post-consumer level
- Limited upcycle markets currently available but not economically viable
- Some alternative conversion technologies require consistent volumes and quantities which are difficult to achieve from post-consumer collection
- Downcycling growing
The Energy Bag
REFLEX (Recycling of Flexible Packaging) Project
Flexible Packaging in a Circular Economy (FIACE)
Circular Economy for Flexible Packaging (CEFLEX)
Materials Recovery for the Future (MRFF)
Closed Loop Foundation
Flexible Aluminum (Containing Laminate) Collection Trial
Developing a sustainable solution to recover multi-material films will require solutions across all phases of the recovery system
In summarizing the key findings found in the final reports issued by the various collaborative projects, key lessons and next steps begin to emerge which offer a promising roadmap towards sustainable recycling solutions for multi-material flexible packaging.
Industry Working Groups
Considering the significant advantages to using multi-material flexible packaging, many users and manufacturers continue to seek sustainable solutions for their end of life. Evaluating lifecycle impacts of different recovery schemes, identifying opportunities to improve processes, and seeking to drive recycling options are common objectives by a variety of industry coalitions. Below is a list of many of the current industry initiatives exploring viable solutions to increase the recovery options of multi-material packaging.
American Chemistry Council: Plastics to Fuel & Petrochemistry Alliance (PTF)
Formed in 2014, this group seeks to increase the awareness of plastics-to-fuel (PTF) technologies with the aim to establish PTF into a strong and viable alternative energy industry. Additionally, the group seeks to increase understanding of the sustainability benefits of using this technology as a recovery solution for difficult to recover plastics. Engagement is through paid membership to the Alliance.
Flexible Packaging Resource Recovery Task Group
This ongoing working group of the Flexible Packaging Association seeks to facilitate the advancement of flexible packaging recovery, with a focus on recovery options. Only members of the Flexible Packaging Association may be engaged; although the task group and association do have a history of sharing resources and collaborating with peers on like-minded projects.
Website: Flexible Packaging Association
PACNEXT: Multi-Material Film & Bags Committee
PACNEXT launched the Multi-Material Film & Bags project committee in 2011 in order to assess opportunities for improving cost effective film recovery. The committee is currently working on a collaborative project with Stewardship Ontario, the Continuous Improvement Fund and the Canadian Plastics Industry Association. The project aims to demonstrate the feasibility of recycling post-consumer multi-material flexible packaging. They are currently performing a trial with three end-processors.
Engagement in this committee is through membership with PACNEXT
Mechanical Recycling Options
Although the technical capability exists, the challenge with existing processes for mechanical recycling of multi-material flexible packaging is the need to know what the incoming resin composition is and keeping it consistent and relatively clean. As more information and processes are tested for effective collection and sortation, wider application of these technologies may exist.
Other End-of-Life Options
Recovery options for multi-material flexible packaging includes more than just recycling. Creative thinking in design and end products can permit for increased opportunity.
Chemical Recycling: The chemical reconstitution of plastic films to a synthetic oil. This is done by heating the plastic at high temperatures in a chamber that is void of oxygen. Once converted into synthesis oil, a variety of end products may be created.
Emerging research on the best available technologies suggests this may be one of the most sustainable and viable options currently available for the end of life management of multi-material flexible packaging. However, most waste-to-fuel technologies are still in the pilot stage and the economics of the market are still emerging. Sortation and collection of significant volumes is still a challenge. The processing of multi-material flexible packaging only is unlikely to produce sufficient volume, additional plastics to supplement processing demand is likely.
Waste-to-energy: The process of generating energy in the form of electricity and/or heat from the combustion of mixed waste, including multi-material flexible packaging left for disposal.
While waste-to-energy is a commonly accepted practice in many European countries, it is less popular in North America. Access to facilities may be limited and the ability to re-use materials is eliminated.
Compostability and composting: The ability to create multi-material compostable films is another opportunity to consider. According to European Standard EN 13432, and supported by ATSM D6400, compostable films must breakdown a minimum of 90% into CO2, water and minerals within an industrial composting setting within six months. Additionally, they must not leave any harmful residue behind. Films designated to be compostable can be labelled by either the European OK Compost label, the Biodegradable Products Institute(BPI) label, or the SPC’s How2Compost label, after proving that they pass ASTM D6400 requirements in an approved laboratory test.
While compostability may be an option, collection and acceptance of compostable films still remains limited in most municipalities, and access to industrial composting is significantly restricted as a result of limited permitted facilities.
- Happy Family Organics
- Printpack, Inc.
- Keurig Dr Pepper
- delfort USA, Inc.
- Mars, Incorporated
- Constantia Flexibles International GmbH
- Seventh Generation
- ExxonMobil Chemical Co.
- Nestlé USA
- Seattle Public Utilities
- American Packaging Corporation
- Danone North America
- Barilla America
- General Mills, Inc.
- Bemis Company, Inc.
- Solvay Specialty Polymers USA, LLC
- Clif Bar & Co.
- Jindal Films
- Kellogg Company, The
- Charter NEX Films
- RSE USA
- More Recycling
- Label Technology Inc.
- Clorox Company, The
- J. M. Smucker Company, The
- Procter & Gamble
- SC Johnson
- Sealed Air Corporation
- Chef Pack, LLC
- Washington State Department of Ecology
- Beiersdorf AG
- Insulated Products Corporation
- Hewlett-Packard Company (HP)
- TC Transcontinental